blob: 75b7b7c8f67846ba8fc048fc4c255495e4b3b81f [file] [log] [blame]
use rustc_errors::{Diag, EmissionGuarantee, SubdiagMessageOp, Subdiagnostic};
use rustc_macros::{LintDiagnostic, Subdiagnostic};
use rustc_middle::thir::Pat;
use rustc_middle::ty::Ty;
use rustc_span::Span;
use crate::rustc::{RustcPatCtxt, WitnessPat};
#[derive(Subdiagnostic)]
#[label(pattern_analysis_uncovered)]
pub struct Uncovered<'tcx> {
#[primary_span]
span: Span,
count: usize,
witness_1: Pat<'tcx>,
witness_2: Pat<'tcx>,
witness_3: Pat<'tcx>,
remainder: usize,
}
impl<'tcx> Uncovered<'tcx> {
pub fn new<'p>(
span: Span,
cx: &RustcPatCtxt<'p, 'tcx>,
witnesses: Vec<WitnessPat<'p, 'tcx>>,
) -> Self
where
'tcx: 'p,
{
let witness_1 = cx.hoist_witness_pat(witnesses.get(0).unwrap());
Self {
span,
count: witnesses.len(),
// Substitute dummy values if witnesses is smaller than 3. These will never be read.
witness_2: witnesses
.get(1)
.map(|w| cx.hoist_witness_pat(w))
.unwrap_or_else(|| witness_1.clone()),
witness_3: witnesses
.get(2)
.map(|w| cx.hoist_witness_pat(w))
.unwrap_or_else(|| witness_1.clone()),
witness_1,
remainder: witnesses.len().saturating_sub(3),
}
}
}
#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]
#[diag(pattern_analysis_overlapping_range_endpoints)]
#[note]
pub struct OverlappingRangeEndpoints<'tcx> {
#[label]
pub range: Span,
#[subdiagnostic]
pub overlap: Vec<Overlap<'tcx>>,
}
pub struct Overlap<'tcx> {
pub span: Span,
pub range: Pat<'tcx>,
}
impl<'tcx> Subdiagnostic for Overlap<'tcx> {
fn add_to_diag_with<G: EmissionGuarantee, F: SubdiagMessageOp<G>>(
self,
diag: &mut Diag<'_, G>,
_: F,
) {
let Overlap { span, range } = self;
// FIXME(mejrs) unfortunately `#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]`
// does not support `#[subdiagnostic(eager)]`...
let message = format!("this range overlaps on `{range}`...");
diag.span_label(span, message);
}
}
#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]
#[diag(pattern_analysis_excluside_range_missing_max)]
pub struct ExclusiveRangeMissingMax<'tcx> {
#[label]
#[suggestion(code = "{suggestion}", applicability = "maybe-incorrect")]
/// This is an exclusive range that looks like `lo..max` (i.e. doesn't match `max`).
pub first_range: Span,
/// Suggest `lo..=max` instead.
pub suggestion: String,
pub max: Pat<'tcx>,
}
#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]
#[diag(pattern_analysis_excluside_range_missing_gap)]
pub struct ExclusiveRangeMissingGap<'tcx> {
#[label]
#[suggestion(code = "{suggestion}", applicability = "maybe-incorrect")]
/// This is an exclusive range that looks like `lo..gap` (i.e. doesn't match `gap`).
pub first_range: Span,
pub gap: Pat<'tcx>,
/// Suggest `lo..=gap` instead.
pub suggestion: String,
#[subdiagnostic]
/// All these ranges skipped over `gap` which we think is probably a mistake.
pub gap_with: Vec<GappedRange<'tcx>>,
}
pub struct GappedRange<'tcx> {
pub span: Span,
pub gap: Pat<'tcx>,
pub first_range: Pat<'tcx>,
}
impl<'tcx> Subdiagnostic for GappedRange<'tcx> {
fn add_to_diag_with<G: EmissionGuarantee, F: SubdiagMessageOp<G>>(
self,
diag: &mut Diag<'_, G>,
_: F,
) {
let GappedRange { span, gap, first_range } = self;
// FIXME(mejrs) unfortunately `#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]`
// does not support `#[subdiagnostic(eager)]`...
let message = format!(
"this could appear to continue range `{first_range}`, but `{gap}` isn't matched by \
either of them"
);
diag.span_label(span, message);
}
}
#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]
#[diag(pattern_analysis_non_exhaustive_omitted_pattern)]
#[help]
#[note]
pub(crate) struct NonExhaustiveOmittedPattern<'tcx> {
pub scrut_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
#[subdiagnostic]
pub uncovered: Uncovered<'tcx>,
}
#[derive(LintDiagnostic)]
#[diag(pattern_analysis_non_exhaustive_omitted_pattern_lint_on_arm)]
#[help]
pub(crate) struct NonExhaustiveOmittedPatternLintOnArm {
#[label]
pub lint_span: Span,
#[suggestion(code = "#[{lint_level}({lint_name})]\n", applicability = "maybe-incorrect")]
pub suggest_lint_on_match: Option<Span>,
pub lint_level: &'static str,
pub lint_name: &'static str,
}