| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&boxed_slice[1]` |
| | |
| note: the lint level is defined here |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:10:9 |
| | |
| LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)] |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| = note: `-D clippy::unwrap-used` implied by `-D warnings` |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_slice[0]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_vec[0]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_vecdeque[0]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_hashmap[&1]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_btreemap[&1]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:21 |
| | |
| LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `boxed_slice[1]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:22 |
| | |
| LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:9 |
| | |
| LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `boxed_slice[0]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:10 |
| | |
| LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53:9 |
| | |
| LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_slice[0]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53:10 |
| | |
| LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:9 |
| | |
| LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:10 |
| | |
| LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:9 |
| | |
| LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vecdeque[0]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:10 |
| | |
| LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:67:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0..1]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:67:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:68:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0..1]` |
| |
| error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:68:17 |
| | |
| LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| | |
| = note: if this value is `None`, it will panic |
| = help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:78:24 |
| | |
| LL | let _x: &i32 = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&f[1 + 2]` |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:81:18 |
| | |
| LL | let _x = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap().to_string(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `f[1 + 2]` |
| |
| error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:84:18 |
| | |
| LL | let _x = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap().abs(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `f[1 + 2]` |
| |
| error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:101:33 |
| | |
| LL | let b = rest.get_mut(linidx(j, k) - linidx(i, k) - 1).unwrap(); |
| | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&mut rest[linidx(j, k) - linidx(i, k) - 1]` |
| |
| error: aborting due to 30 previous errors |
| |