src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/mutex_atomic.stderr

error: consider using an `AtomicBool` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:8:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(true);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `-D clippy::mutex-atomic` implied by `-D warnings`
   = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::mutex_atomic)]`

error: consider using an `AtomicUsize` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:11:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(5usize);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using an `AtomicIsize` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:13:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(9isize);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using an `AtomicPtr` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:16:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(&x as *const u32);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using an `AtomicPtr` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:18:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(&mut x as *mut u32);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using an `AtomicU32` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:20:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(0u32);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `-D clippy::mutex-integer` implied by `-D warnings`
   = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::mutex_integer)]`

error: consider using an `AtomicI32` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:23:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(0i32);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using an `AtomicU8` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:26:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(0u8);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using an `AtomicI16` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:28:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(0i16);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using an `AtomicI8` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:30:25
   |
LL |     let _x: Mutex<i8> = Mutex::new(0);
   |                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using an `AtomicI64` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
  --> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:33:5
   |
LL |     Mutex::new(X);
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: aborting due to 11 previous errors